To protect her children from losing their mother too young, she opted for surgery, which she describes in some detail. That unexpected mash-up—glamorous Hollywood superstar, global ambassador for celebrity humanitarianism, and the sober Gray Lady, the brainstem of the establishment—has sent the issue viral. Women have written about their own experiences with breast cancer or its specter , and have been variously grateful to or angry at her for announcing her course of action, or hating or loving the way she uses her celebrity. Others have commented on the culture of celebritizing disease and how the wealthy get a different standard of health care from the rest of us, or on what this means for Obamacare.
Angelina Jolie has more body parts removed 'just in case' after cancer fears - reddirtprimitives.com
She had a previous surgery in to remove her breasts because she has a mutation in a gene called BRCA1 which increases the risk of breast and ovarian cancers. But that was a major part of her decision. Mutations in the BRCA genes there are two, named 1 and 2 respectively increase a person's risk for cancers, including breast and ovarian. Only about 0.
She DIED from it. How many of the young women who look up to her will rush off to their OBGYNs and request similar testing and the same procedure now? But it is those people who put her on a pedestal. I cannot imagine this choice was a publicity stunt.
The actress, who had her breasts removed in , wrote the story eight years before cancer killed her mother Marcheline Bertrand. Her fictional tale, called Skins, featured a young woman who opted for drastic surgery after her mother learned she had terminal breast cancer. And last week she revealed she also had her ovaries and fallopian tubes taken out recently as an added precaution.